Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Khan, Akhtar Ali
- Exploitation of Chilocorus infernalis Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) for Suppression of the San Jose Scale, Diaspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in Apple Orchards
Abstract Views :220 |
PDF Views:133
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar campus, Srinagar, 191 121, Jammu and Kashmir, IN
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar campus, Srinagar, 191 121, Jammu and Kashmir, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 24, No 4 (2010), Pagination: 369-372Abstract
Chilocorus infernalis Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) was evaluated against San Jose scale in apple orchards at five locations in farmers' fields in Kashmir during 2008. The predator was released @ 20, 25, 30, 35/plant three times at 10 days intervals starting from 1st week of June. The population of San Jose scale was recorded before release and a month after release from three apple trees at each location selected at random. All the four rates of release were effective for the control of the scale. Release of C. infernalis @ 35/plant significantly reduced the infestation of the San Jose scale in all locations of Kashmir.Keywords
Chilocorus Infernalis, Apple Orchard, Suppression, Predation, Releases, San Jose Scale.- Stage-Specific Functional Response of Predaceous Ladybird Beetle, Harmonia eucharis (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Green Apple Aphid, Aphis pomi De Geer (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
Abstract Views :247 |
PDF Views:127
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar 191 121, Jammu and Kashmir, IN
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar 191 121, Jammu and Kashmir, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 24, No 3 (2010), Pagination: 222-226Abstract
Functional response of different larval instars, adult males and females of the predacious coccinellid, Harmonia eucharis (Mulsant), was evaluated under laboratory conditions to varying density of green apple aphid, Aphis pomi De Geer. The life stages of H. eucharis exhibited a curvilinear Type II functional response. The fourth instar larva of H. eucharis consumed more aphids (34.06 aphids/day each) due to its larger size and greater voracity as compared to first instar larva (14.73 aphids/day each), second instar larva (25.73 aphids/day each), third instar larvae (29.06 aphids/day each), adult female (28.06 aphids/day each) and adult male (22.06 aphids/day each). The search rate and handling time estimated for different stages of H. eucharis showed that the fourth instar had higher search rate, whereas the handling time showed the opposite trend as search rate. The results suggested that fourth instar larva of H. eucharis is the efficient predator for the biological control of A. pomi. Further field-based studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.Keywords
Aphis pomi, Coccinellids, Functional Response, Handling Time, Harmonia eucharis, Search Rate.- Functional and Aggregational Response of Chrysoperla sp. (carnea-group) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
Abstract Views :232 |
PDF Views:121
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar 191121, Jammu and Kashmir, IN
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar 191121, Jammu and Kashmir, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 24, No 1 (2010), Pagination: 28-34Abstract
This study evaluated the functional and aggregational responses of 2nd and 3rd instar larvae of Chrysoperla sp. (carnea-group) on medium sized aphids of Brevicoryne brassicae (L.). The functional response was investigated at prey densities of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 and 128 aphids per larvae and the studies revealed that behaviour of both the larval instars matched Holling's Type II functional response. The response curve exhibited a curvilinear rise to the plateau. The 3rd instar larvae displayed a higher rate of predation than the 2nd instar. The maximum attack rate (a) with lowest handling time (Th) was determined by r2 value which was found to be highest for 3rd instar larvae (r2 = 0.7308) followed by 2nd instar larvae (r2= 0.733). Numerical response (aggregational response) was investigated at varied density of prey, viz., 8, 16, 32, 64 and 128 aphids and varied density of predators, viz., 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. The maximum aggregation response was observed at highest host density of aphids (128) with the maximum number of predators (5). The rate of attack (a) was highest for 3rd instar larvae (2.32) at lowest predator density (1) and showed a downward trend with increase in predator densities due to intra-specific competition under conditions of food limitation.Keywords
Aggregational Response, Brevicoryne brassicae, Chrysoperla Sp. (carnea-group), Functional Response, Handling Time, Numerical Response, Search Rate.- Comparison of Spider Diversity in Relation to Pesticide Use in Apple Orchards of Kashmir
Abstract Views :325 |
PDF Views:121
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar 191121, Jammu and Kashmir, IN
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar 191121, Jammu and Kashmir, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 26, No 1 (2012), Pagination: 1-10Abstract
Species diversity, abundance and habitat association of spiders were studied in 9 sprayed and unsprayed apple orchards in Kashmir. Fifty species of spiders were recorded from unsprayed orchards while 46 from sprayed orchards. Total number of species recorded from individual orchards varied from 31-38 in unsprayed orchards and from 20-28 in sprayed orchards. The proportion of web builders, visual hunters and tactile hunters was recorded as 22.32 %, 28.32% and 15.78% respectively in unsprayed orchards while, the corresponding figures for sprayed orchards were appreciably lower viz., 8.84%, 16.96% and 7.78%, respectively. The web building spider families (Theridiidae and Tetragnathidae) were most affected by pesticide application followed by visual hunters (Lycosidae and Salticidae) whereas, the tactile hunters were the least affected with the exception of members of family Thomisidae. The spider species found to be altogether absent from the sprayed orchards, viz., Araneus trifolium Hentz, Hyposigha spp., Zygoballus spp., Thomisus cherapunjeus Tikader constituted very low percentage even in the spider communities that were not under the pesticide application pressure. The sprayed orchards exhibited poor spider diversity and less even distribution of spider taxa while species richness was little affected by pesticide application, the only exception being family Araneidae. The results indicated that pesticide application is posing a serious threat to diversity and richness of spiders in the apple orchards.Keywords
Araneae, Pesticide Application, Relative Abundance, Species Diversity, Species Richness, Species Evenness and Spider.References
- Angeli G, Forti D, Pesarini C. 1996. Epigeic spiders (Araneae) in apple and pear orchards in Trentino. Redia, 79: 113–121.
- Anonymous 2007. Annual Report. Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar, India.
- Barrion AT, Litsinger JA. 1995. Riceland spider of South and Southeast Asia. CABI International, Cambridge, U.K. 736pp.
- Barrion AT, and Litsinger JA. 1981. The spider fauna of Philippine rice agro-ecosystem-I. Dryland, Phillippine Entomol. 5:139–166.
- Bishop L, Riechert SE. 1990. Spider colonisation of agro–ecosystems: mode and source. Environ Entomol. 19:1738–1745.
- Bogya S, Szinetar CS, Marko V. 1999. Species composition of spider (Araneae) assemblages in apple and pear orchards in the Carpathian Basin. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung. 34: 99–122.
- Bostanian NJ, Dondale CD, Binns MR, Pitre D. 1984. Effects of pesticide use on spiders (Araneae) in Quebec apple orchards. Can Entomol. 116: 662–675.
- Chant DA 1956. Predacious spiders in orchards in south–eastern England. J Hortic Sci. 116: 662–675.
- Culin JD, Yeargan KV. 1983. The effect of selected insecticides on spiders in alfalfa. J Kansas Entomo Soc. 56: 151–158.
- Development Core Team 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07–0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
- Dondale CD, Parent B, Pitre D. 1979. A 6– year study of spiders (Araneae) in a Quebec apple orchard. Can Entomol. 111: 377–390.
- Dondale CD. 1956. Annotated lists of spiders (Araneae) in Nova Scotia apple orchards. Can Entomol. 88: 697–700.
- Dondale CD. 1966. The spider fauna (Aranreida) of deciduous orchard in the Australian Capital Territory. Aust J Zool. 14: 1157–1192.
- Gajbe PU. 2004. Spider Fauna of Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh (Arachnida: Areaneae). Zool Surv of India, Occasional Paper, 227: 1–154.
- Hagley, EAC. 1974. The arthropod fauna in in unsprayed apple orchards in Ontario II. Some predaceous species. Proc Entomol Soc Ontario, 105: 28–40.
- Herne DHC, Putman WL. 1966. Toxicity of some pecticides to predacious arthropods in Ontario peach orchards. Can Entomol. 98: 936–942.
- Joanna W, Ronald J. 1997. Pesticide effect on faunal composition, abundance and body length of spider (Araneae) in apple orchards. Environ Entomol. 26: 763–776.
- Kaston BJ. 1978. How to Know the Spiders. 3rd edition Win. C. Brown Company, Dubuque, Iowa.
- Khan AA, Khan ZH. 2011. Spider fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) in horticultural ecosystem (Chapter 17): Animal Diversity, Natural History and Conservation Dr. V. K. Gupta (ed). Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, India, 1: 313–338.
- Khan AA, Misra DS. 2009. Impact of prey-size and predator– size on predation of rice green leafhopper, Nephotettix virescens (Distant) (Homoptera: by wolf spider, Lycosa pseudoannulata Boeseberg and Strand (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ind J Ecol. 36: 59–84.
- Khan AA. 2006. Relative abundance of spider fauna in rice ecosystem. SAARC J of Agric. 4: 159–166.
- Khan AA. 2009. Biodiversity of spider fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) in horticultural ecosystem of Kashmir. Ind J Ecol. 36: 59-84.
- Khan AA. 2011. Spider fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) in temperate fruit orchards of Kashmir. J Biol Control, 25 (2): 103–113.
- Legner EF, Oatman ER. 1964. Spiders on apple in Wisconsin and their abundance in a natural and two artificial environments. Can Entomol. 96: 1202–1207.
- Madsen HF, Madsen BJ. 1982. Population of beneficial and pest arthropods in an organic and pesticide treated apple orchard in British Columbia. Can Entomol. 114: 1083–1088.
- Mansour F, Rosen D, Shulov A. 1980. A survey of spider population (Araneae) in sprayed and unsprayed apple orchards in Israel and their ability to feed on the larvae of Spodoptera littoralis (Biosd.). Acta Oecol. 1: 189–197.
- Mansour F. 1987. Effects of pesticides on spiders occurring on apple and citrus in Israel. Phytoparasitica 15: 43–50.
- Mansour F, Nentwig W. 1988. Effects of agrochemical residues on four spider taxa: laboratory methods for pesticide tests with web-building spiders. Phytoparasitica 16, 317–326.
- Margalef R. 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- McCaffrey JP, Horsburgh RL. 1980. The spider fauna of apple trees in Central Virginia, Environ Entomol. 9: 247–252.
- Miliczky ER, Calkins CO, Horton DR. 2000. Spider abundance and diversity in apple orchards under three insect pest management programme in Washington State, USA. Agric Forest Entomol. 2: 203–215.
- Mukhtar MK. 2004. Taxonomic studies on the foliage spider fauna of Punjab, Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Science, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. PhD Thesis. p 244.
- Nyffler M. 1982. Field studies on the ecological role of the spiders as insect predators in agroecosystems (abandoned grassland, meadows and cereal fields) Ph D Thesis. Swiss Fed. Inst. Technol., Zurich, Switzerland.
- Pekar S. 1998. Effect of selective insecticides on the beneficial spider community of a pear orchard in the Czech Republic. P. A. Selden (ed). Proc. 17th European Colloquium of Arachnol, Edinburgh.
- Pickett AD, Patterson NA, Stultz HT, Lord FT. 1946. The influence of spray programme on the fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia: I. An appraisal of the problem and a method of approach. Scientific Agric. 26: 590–600.
- Pielou, EC. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different type of biological collection. J Theor Biol. 13: 131–144.
- Pielou EC. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley–Interscience, New York.
- Pielou EC. 1975. Ecology diversity. Wiley, New York.
- Platnick NI. 2010. The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html.
- Poole RW. 1974. An introduction to quantitative ecology. McGraw–Hill, New York.
- Richert S.E., Lockely T. 1984. Spiders as Biocontrol Agents. Annu Rev Entomol. 29: 299–320.
- Sackett TE, Buddle CM, Vincent C. 2008. Comparisons of the composition of foliage-dwelling spider assemblages in apple orchards and adjacent deciduous forest. Can Entomol. 140: 338–347.
- Samu F, Mathews GA, Lake D, Vollrath F. 1992. Spider webs are efficient collectors of agricultural spray. Pesticide Sci. 36: 47–51.
- Shannon SE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bull Syst Tech. 27: 379–423.
- Tikader BK, Bal A. 1981. Studies on some orb- weaving spiders of the genera Neoscona Simon and Araneus Clerk of the family Araneidae ( Argiopidae) from India. Records Zool Surv of India, Occasional Paper, 24: 1–60.
- Tikader BK. 1982. Fauna of India, Spiders (Araneidae and Gnaphosidae). II (1–2): Zool Surv India 533 pp.
- Tikader BK. 1987. Hand book of Indian Spiders. Zoological Surv India Calcutta, India, pp 251.
- Turnbull AL. 1973. Ecology of true spiders (Araneomorphae). Annu Rev Entomo. 18: 305–348.
- Velverde AJ, Lobo JM. 2007. Determinant of local spider (Araneidae and Thomisidae) species richness on a regional scale: climate and altitude vs. Habitat structure. Ecol Entomol. 32, 113–122.
- Diversity and Foraging Behaviour of Spider (Arachnida: Araneae) in the Temperate Maize Ecosystem of Kashmir
Abstract Views :281 |
PDF Views:250
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar-191121(Jammu and Kashmir), IN
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar-191121(Jammu and Kashmir), IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 26, No 2 (2012), Pagination: 85-95Abstract
The species composition, habitat associations, web construction and foraging behaviour of spiders were studied in temperate maize ecosystem of Kashmir. Thirty seven species under 13 families and 28 genera were recorded from all study sites. Most spiders belonged to the Lycosidae, Theridiidae, Tetragnathidae, Salticidae, Pisauridae and Gnaphosidae. These families comprised 62.84% of total spiders collected in maize ecosystem. The maximum number of species was recorded in the family Araneidae but their numbers were quit low. The maximum proportion of spiders were in the group of visual hunter (53.93%) followed by webbuilding spiders (28.55%) which includes orb-web builders (15.94%) and space-web builders (12.61%) and the lowest was 17.52% of tactile hunters. The several species of spiders encountered in each location exhibited specific habitat preferences and segregated the microhabitat in to numerous niches. Since several maize insect pests regularly dwell frequently of these niches, diverse spider species might act in a complementary mode to suppress insect pest populations.Keywords
Biodiversity, Foraging Behaviour, Habitat Associations, Maize Ecosystem, Species Composition, Spider and Relative.References
- Bambaradeniya CNB, Edirisinghe JP. 2001. The ecological role of spiders in rice field of Sri Lanka. Biodivers. 2: 3–10.
- Barrion AT, Litsinger JA. 1995. Riceland spider of South and Southeast Asia. CABI International, Cambridge, U.K. 736 pp.
- Bogya S, Szinetar CS, Marko V. 1999. Species composition of spider (Araneae) assemblages in apple and pear orchards in the Carpathian Basin. Acta Phytopath Ent Hungarica, 34: 99–122.
- Coddington JA, Levi HW. 1991. Systematics and evolution of spiders. Annual Rev Ecol Syst. 22: 565–592. Duffey E. 1966. Spider ecology and habitat structure. Senck Biology, 47: 45–49.
- Khan AA, Misra DS. 2004. Studies on qualitative and quantitative composition of spider fauna in rice ecosystem of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Pl Prot Bull. 55: 35–41.
- Khan AA, Misra DS. 2006. Abundance of arthropod fauna in rice ecosystem. Env Ecol. 24: 97–101.
- Khan AA, Misra DS. 2003a. Inter and intra specific interaction of wolf spider among predatory arthropods in rice ecosystem. Pl Prot Bull. 54: 10–13.
- Khan AA, Misra DS 2003b. Studies on the life table of wolf spider (Lycosa pseudoannulata Boes et Str.; Araneae: Lycosidae) in rice ecosystem. Oryza 40: 31–33.
- Khan AA. 2006. Relative abundance of spider fauna in rice ecosystem. SAARC J Agric. 4: 159–166. Khan AA. 2009. Biodiversity of spider fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) in horticultural ecosystem of Kashmir. Indian J Ecol. 36: 59–84.
- Khan AA. 2011. Spider fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) in temperate fruit orchards of Kashmir. J Biol Control 25(2): 103–113.
- Khan AA, Khan ZH. 2011. Spider fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) in horticultural ecosystem. In: p. 313-338. Dr. V. K. Gupta (Eds): Animal Diversity, Natural History and Conservation. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, India, 480 pp.
- Khan AA, Misra DS. 2009. Impact of prey-size and predator-size on predation of rice green leafhopper, Nephotettix virescens (Distant) (Homoptera) by wolf spider, Lycosa pseudoannulata Boeseberg and Strand (Araneae: Lycosidae). Indian J Ecol. 36: 59–84.
- Kumar MG, Velusamy R. 1996. Composition of the spider fauna in rice ecosystem of Tamil Nadu. Madras Agric J. 83: 448–451.
- Lang A, Filser J, Henschel JR. 1999. Predation by ground beetles and wolf spider on herbivorous insects in maize crops. Agric Ecosys Env. 72: 189–199.
- Ludy C, Lang A. 2006. A 3-year field-scale monitoring of foliage-dwelling spiders (Araneae) in transgenic Bt maize fields and adjacent field margins. Biol Control 38: 314–324.
- Miliczky ER, Calkins CO, Horton DR. 2000. Spider abundance and diversity in apple orchards under three insect pest management programme in Washington State, USA. Agric Forest Ent. 2: 203–215.
- Nyffeler M. 1999 – Prey selection of spiders in the field. J Arachnol. 27: 317–324.
- Nyffler M. 1982. Field studies on the ecological role of the spiders as insect predators in agro-ecosystems (abandoned grasslands, meadows, and cereal fields). Ph D Thesis. Swiss Fed. Inst. Technol., Zurich, Switzerland.
- Oberg S, Ekbom B, Bommarco R. 2007. Influence of habitat type and surrounding landscape on spider diversity in Swedish agro-ecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Env. 122: 211–219.
- Platnick NI. 2011. The world spider catalog, version 12.0. American Museum of Natural History, inline at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html.
- Richardson ML, Hanks L. 2009. Partitioning of niches among four orb-weaving spiders in grassland habitat. Env Ent. 38: 651–656.
- Richert SE, Lockely T. 1984. Spiders as biocontrol agents. Ann Rev Ent. 29: 299–320.
- Sackett TE, Buddle CM, Vincent C. 2008. Comparisons of the composition of foliage-dwelling spider assemblages in apple orchards and adjacent deciduous forest. Canadian Ent. 140: 338–347.
- Sebastian PA, Mathew MJ, Beevi SP, Joseph J, Biju CR. 2005. The spider fauna of the irrigated rice ecosystem in central Kerala, India across different elevational ranges. J Arachnol. 33: 247–255.
- Siliwal M, Molur S, Biswas BK. 2005. Indian spiders (Arachnida: Araneae): updated checklist 2005. Zoos Print Journal, 20: 1999–2049.
- Tikader BK, Bal A. 1980. Studies on some orb- weaving spiders of the genera Neoscona Simon and Araneus Clerk of the family Araneidae (Argiopidae) from India. Records Zool Surv India, Occasional Paper, 24: 1–60.
- Tikader BK. 1982. Fauna of India, Spiders (Araneidae and Gnaphosidae). II (1-2): Zool Surv India. 533 pp. Tikader BK. 1987. Hand book of Indian Spiders. Zool Surv India, Calcutta, India, pp 251.
- Turnbull AL. 1973. Ecology of true spiders (Araneomorphae). Ann Rev Ent. 18: 305–348.
- Spider Fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) in Temperate Fruit Orchards of Kashmir
Abstract Views :238 |
PDF Views:139
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar-191121(jammu and Kashmir), IN
1 Division of Entomology, Sher-e-kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar-191121(jammu and Kashmir), IN